HOME

 

News from Matt Cohen:
Important Special Education &
Remedial Education Developments

 

 

Matt Cohen
Monahan & Cohen
225 W. Washington Street
Suite 2300

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone:
(312) 419-0252
Facsimile:
(312) 419-7428
TTY:
(312) 419-7427
www.monahan-cohen.com

 

US Department of Education Issues Final IDEA 2004 Regulations

In November of 2004, the Congress enacted sweeping changes in the IDEA, to be effective July 1, 2005. Whenever federal law is changed, the federal department responsible for implementing the law must enact regulations that help to explain and interpret the law. The US Department of Education has been working on the proposed regulations for almost two years. On August 14, the Department released the final regulations. In many respects, the regulations track the actual language of the law itself. However, there are a number of important changes or additions, both in comparison to the law and to the draft proposed regulations that they previously issued. For those interested in obtaining a copy of the regulations, they can be obtained online at the USDOE Office of Special Education website: http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/idea2004.html#regulations.

Be forewarned that the regulations and the supporting documentation are in excess of 1700 pages in length. The regulations alone, without narrative and interpretation are only 307 pages. They can be obtained from the National Information Center for Handicapped Children and Youth at: http://www.nichcy.org/reauth/IDEA2004regulations.pdf.

The Department of Education's Summary of the changes can be found at: http://www.nichcy.org/idealist.htm.

A book comparing the old and new IDEA regulations has been published by the National Association of State Directors of Special Education and can be purchased for $15 from their website at: http://www.nasdse.org/
documents/SbSorderform.pdf

If you are interested in a summary of the regulations, USDOE has a fact sheet which can be downloaded: http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/
speced/ideafactsheet.html

Some key highlights of the new regulations are:

  • Adds Tourette Syndrome to the list of covered conditions within the Other Health Impaired Category (Sec. 300.8(c)(9)(i))
  • Changes the new SLD criteria to provide that the child be determined eligible if the child is not achieving adequately in relation to the child's age or in relation to state standards, if the child has received "appropriate" (replacing the reference to "research based") instruction (Sec. 309(a and b)). This appears to be a compromise blending some variation of the old discrepancy formula with provision of regular ed instruction to rule out inadequate instruction as the cause of the child's delay
  • Clarifies that there are no limits to the related services for which a child with a cochlear implant is eligible, except for those services that are specific to the implant, such as "installing, maintaining, mapping, or replacing the implant." (Sec. 300.34(b)(2))
  • Reinforces that the provision of supplementary aides, supports and services to children receiving special education should include services necessary for the child to participate in extra-curricular and non-academic activities (Sec. 300.42)
  • Provides that a child is entitled to a free appropriate public education (FAPE) even if the child is receiving passing grades, progressing from year to year, or has not been retained from progressing to the next grade level (Sec. 300.101(c)) This makes clear that grades and credits are not the only relevant factor in deciding whether a child has received FAPE. This is particularly important, with respect to students that have enough credit to graduate, but have not made sufficient progress on their goals, transition needs or other life skills.
  • Provides for a child to be determined to have a learning disability either based on a lack of sufficient progress in relation to state standards after receiving scientific, research based intervention, or based on the child exhibiting a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in performance, achievement or both, that is relevant to the identification of a learning disability, using appropriate assessments. (Sec. 300.309) Note that although the Department of Education and others state otherwise, this latter provision may breathe life back into the use of the discrepancy formula, despite its having been disfavored by Congress.
  • Indicates that parent consent must be obtained before school staff may observe a child for purposes of evaluation (Sec. 300.310(b)) This has been an area where schools have often asserted that observation does not require parent consent.
  • Requires all staff, including teachers, related services personnel, and paraprofessionals, to be advised of their responsibilities in relation to each child's IEP (Sec. 300.323(d)) It is advisable for parents to informally check in with staff at the beginning of the year to make sure that this has occurred and to share the IEP if it hasn't occurred.
  • Requires that the IEP team be informed of any informal changes agreed to between a member of the staff and the parent (Sec. 300.324(a)(4)) Whenever a member of the staff and a parent seek to informally change the IEP, it is my strong suggestion that a written draft of the proposed changes be developed by the parent and staff member, and mutually agreed upon in writing, in order to avoid the chance of misunderstanding or subsequent disagreement.
  • Provides for each state to develop a process for appointment of the parent as representative for a child that has turned 18 and is unable to make decisions for themselves, but has not been determined incompetent (Sec. 300.520 (b)) Note that because the statute does not provide for a particular process to accomplish this, it is up to the states to determine how to do this, consistent with state law.
  • Provides that if the IEP team determines that a child's behavior is directly caused by the school's failure to appropriately implement the IEP, the failure must be rectified by the school district (Sec. 300.530(e)(3))
  • Provides that in determining whether a child's placement is being changed due to a series of short-term suspensions, each of which is less than 10 days, but which total more than 10 days, the school staff will decide if the different incidents reflect a "pattern of behavior," which would trigger stay put safeguards, subject to the right of the parent to challenge the determination in a due process proceeding (Sec. 300.536(b)) Previously, there was no direction as to how the decision about whether there was a pattern of behavior should be made.
  • Provides for the State Education Agency to enforce written settlement agreements under some circumstances (Sec. 300.510(d)(2))

The Department of Education will be holding meetings to explain the new regulations at eight locations around the US:

City

Location

Time & Date

Charlotte, NC

UNC Charlotte Conf. Services
9201 University City Blvd.
380
Bonnie E. Cone University Center
Charlotte, NC 28223

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Tues, Sept. 26th

Tampa, FL

Gibbons Alumni Center
4202 E. Fowler Avenue
University of South Florida

Tampa, FL 33620

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Wed, Sept. 27th

Philadelphia, PA

The Conference Center at Penn State Great Valley Safeguard Scientifics Building 30 E. Swedesford Rd.
Malvern, PA 19355

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Tues, Oct. 17th

Seattle, WA

University of Washington
Kane Hall, Room 130
Seattle, WA 98195-3095

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Tues, Oct. 24th

Minneapolis, MN

PACER Center
8161 Normandale Blvd.
Minneapolis, MN 55437

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Wed, Oct. 25th

Dallas, TX

Region 10 Education Service Center
Region 10 Annex Building
904 Abrams Rd.
Richardson, TX 75081

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Thurs, Nov. 2nd

Denver, CO

Arvada Center for the Arts & Humanities
6901 Wadsworth Blvd.
Arvada, CO 80003-9985

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Wed, Nov. 8th

Sacramento, CA

Capitol East End Complex
1500 Capitol Ave.
Sacramento, CA 95814

5:30 pm - 9 pm
Tues, Nov. 14th

For further information, please contact Tanya Kosinski at Tanya.Kosinski@ed.gov or 202-245-7407.

More information on these presentations can be obtained from the Department's website: http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/
idea/idea2004- schedule.html


Key No Child Left Behind Deadline Missed by All States

The No Child Left Behind Act was intended to dramatically improve the quality of public education, in part by implementing national standards for teacher qualifications. The NCLB standards required that all states have highly qualified teachers in every core academic class by the end of the 2005-2006 school year.

According to a US Department of Education (USDOE) report issued on August 16, NO STATE met the federal requirement and 37 states met only some of the criteria established by the US DOE. They will be required to submit new data or new plans. Four states (Hawaii, Missouri, Utah and Wisconsin) failed the federal requirements altogether.

The feds announced a new goal of 100% compliance by the end of the current school year, but the data released by the Department makes clear that many states are years away from compliance. For more information, see http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/08/08162006a.html.

What is especially troubling about this news is that the core of No Child Left Behind is the provision of qualified teachers throughout the US. This is also troubling because the new IDEA 2004 legislation provides for schools to make available research-based reading intervention in regular education as an alternative to special education services, even though many schools lack teachers qualified to provide the specialized reading instruction. In each instance, the Congress has established educational programs predicated on having qualified teachers available, without the schools actually having sufficient numbers of qualified teachers on their staffs. For children with possible learning disabilities, this may mean that the process of evaluating them for special education eligibility is delayed while they are provided specialized instruction by teachers that are not adequately trained to provide that instruction.

Please contact me if you have questions or comments.


ON A PERSONAL NOTE, the CHADD MATT COHEN Membership Support Fund, which was established by CHADD in my honor to fund CHADD (Children and Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) memberships and CHADD conference registration and expenses for individuals unable to otherwise participate, is running perilously low.

If you are interested in making a contribution to the CHADD MATT COHEN Support Fund, you can do so by printing off a CHADD Donation Form, at http://www.chadd.org/Content/CHADD/AboutCHADD/DonatetoCHADD/
Individuals/HowtoDonate/default.htm
.

Please make sure to check the box for the MATT COHEN Scholarship Fund when you send in your donation. You can also donate directly via the CHADD website, at http://www.chadd.org/source/Donations/Donate.cfm. In the scroll down bar, select Donated Memberships to ensure that the funds are designated for the MATT COHEN fund.

If you make a donation to the Fund, I would love to get an email from you so that I can send you a personal thank you.

Thanks,

Matt Cohen
mdcspedlaw@earthlink.net

Monahan & Cohen
225 W. Washington Street, Suite 2300
Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone:
(312) 419-0252
Facsimile:
(312) 419-7428
TTY:
(312) 419-7427
www.monahan-cohen.com


P.S. My upcoming presentation schedule is as follows:

October 16 & 17, 2006
Matthew Cohen
Transition Under the New IDEA: Untapped Opportunities / Unmet
Responsibilities Illinois State Transition Conference Downers Grove, IL

October 19, 2006
Matthew Cohen
IDEA vs. 504, Rights for Children with AD/HD Center for Educational Excellence
Hattiesburg, Mississippi

October 25, 2006 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
Matthew Cohen
Understanding the Law in Schools
CHADD National Conference
Hyatt Regency O'Hare,
Chicago, Illinois www.chadd.org

October 27, 2006 3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Matthew Cohen
Reasonable Accommodations for College Students CHADD National Conference Hyatt Regency O'Hare,
Chicago, Illinois www.chadd.org

January 17, 2007 9:00 am - 4:30 pm
Matthew Cohen
Keeping Current With Increasingly Common Diagnoses of ADHD, Autism, Asperger's, OCD and Tourette's Lorman Education Services, Rosemont, IL www.lorman.com |
715-833-3940

February 28, 2007
Matthew Cohen
Special Education Advocacy Services
Cleveland, Ohio

March 1-4, 2007 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
COPAA Conference
Baltimore Marriott Waterfront
www.copaa.com

March 7, 2007
Ohio Coalition for Education of Children with Disabilities Toledo, Ohio

March 14, 2007 7:00 pm
Matthew Cohen
Eligibility, Evaluations & IEP's
Lake County Learning Disability Association Gurnee, IL

Information about the following presentations may be obtained by contacting the sponsoring organization or Tami Kuipers at Monahan & Cohen: (312) 419-0252. Some presentations are free of charge, while others require pre-registration and/or registration fees.

 

 

Forward email

This email was sent to tkuipers@monahan-cohen.com, by mdcspedlaw@earthlink.net

Powered by


Monahan & Cohen | 225 West
Washington | Suite 2300 | Chicago | IL | 60606 | 312-419-0252